i was looking through my notes for sexual orientation, gender and the law, and i came across my notes for lawrence v. texas. do you know who called the police on the two men, lawrence and garner - the two that ended up getting arrested for engaging in sodomy?
it was garner's ex-lover, who called in a false weapons report implicating lawrence and garner. yep. that's right. garner's jilted ex-boyfriend.
so, here's a shout-out to all the psycho exes out there. you might just help trigger a civil rights movement with your phony police reports. sucker.
speaking of the regulation of sex by the law...
it seems to me that the only difference between pornography and prostitution is the existence of a video camera or at least an audience of some sort.
check it:
if you don't videotape it or if you don't let other people watch you in some sort of adult theater setting, and there is money being exchanged for sex acts, it's illegal, and you can be thrown in jail.
if you DO videotape it or you let people watch you in an "official" adult theater or peep show, and there is money being exchanged for sex acts, you can end up famous like jenna jameson and win an AVP award.
is it just me, or is this scheme just a little bit hokey... how is being an agent for a porn star any different from being a pimp?
come to think of it, how is ANY hollywood agent any different from a pimp?
and now that i'm on that road... how is any entertainment lawyer any different than a middle man in the ho trafficking business? and one who specializes in the kissing of pimp ass?
and how we're back to sex acts involving buttocks. full circle. the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment