michelle malkin says "i was wrong." despite my disagreement with almost everything she says, at least she has the integrity to come forth and admit that her speculation of the jersey city murders of a christian egyptian family as being religiously motivated was premature and turned out to be wrong. i saw an article in a newark newspaper reporting the arrests of two drug dealers in connection with the nurder, so i decided to wander over to malkin's site to see if she would say anything about the new developments or continue to hypothesize that the murders were committed by islamists. and lo and behold, she done did it. jihadwatch, however, continues to prattle on, suspecting a jihadist connection. you should check out the comment section too. i think quite a few people on that site have taken a break from reality.
let's just assume that the family was indeed killed in a manner associated with radical islamists. and now the police have arrested the two men who committed the murder, men who weren't radical islamists. however, one of them happened to live directly above the family. if you wanted to murder the family below you and not get caught, wouldn't you hatch a plan to get away with the murder? like say, kill in a manner that would have the police and media sniffing elsewhere? it is awfully stupid to kill someone who lives twenty feet away from you without either an alibi or a means to point the finger elsewhere. just a thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment